Skip to main content
Research Prompts

Identify Biases in a Source

Analyze a text for potential biases — selection, framing, omission, and ideological slant.

intermediateWorks with any modelResearch
Prompt
Please analyze the following text for potential biases. I want a critical reading, not a summary.

**Known context** (optional — include what you know about the author, publication, or date): [KNOWN_CONTEXT]

---
[TEXT]
---

Analyze for:

1. **Selection bias** — what topics, data points, examples, or perspectives are included, and what seems to be excluded or underweighted? What picture would look different if the omitted material were included?

2. **Framing effects** — identify specific word choices, metaphors, or rhetorical structures that guide the reader toward a particular interpretation. Provide direct quotes from the text as examples.

3. **Source bias** — who is cited or quoted, and who is absent? Are the sources diverse in perspective, or do they predominantly represent one viewpoint, institution, or demographic?

4. **Potential motivations** — based on the known context and the content itself, what ideological, financial, institutional, or personal motivations might shape the author's perspective? Note if this is speculative.

5. **Questions a skeptical reader should ask** — list 3-5 specific questions someone should research before accepting the article's framing or conclusions.

6. **Overall bias assessment** — rate the apparent bias as Low, Moderate, or High, and summarize in 2-3 sentences. Note that detecting bias does not mean the factual content is wrong.

How to Use

Paste any article, report, or text into [TEXT]. If you know who wrote it, where it was published, and when, add that to [KNOWN_CONTEXT] — this context helps the model flag potential institutional or ideological influences. Leave [KNOWN_CONTEXT] blank if you want a blind analysis based only on the text itself.

Variables

VariableDescription
[TEXT]The article, report, editorial, or passage you want to analyze
[KNOWN_CONTEXT]Optional background on the author, publisher, funder, or date of publication

Tips

  • Run this prompt before sharing or citing a source — it takes 30 seconds and can save you from unknowingly spreading misleading framing.
  • Detecting bias does not mean a source is wrong or useless; use the output to read more critically, not necessarily to discard the source.