Reasoning Prompts
Pros & Cons Analysis
Generate a structured, balanced list of advantages and disadvantages for any decision, option, or topic.
Prompt
Analyze the pros and cons of [SUBJECT] from the perspective of [PERSPECTIVE]. Structure your response as follows: **Context** (2-3 sentences): What is [SUBJECT] and why does this decision matter? **Pros** List [N] advantages. For each, include: - The benefit (bold) - A 1-2 sentence explanation of why this matters for [PERSPECTIVE] - Estimated magnitude: Low / Medium / High **Cons** List [N] disadvantages using the same format. **Key Trade-offs** Identify the 2-3 most important tensions between the pros and cons. **Verdict** Given [PRIORITY], which factors tip the balance and why?
How to Use
Replace [SUBJECT] with the decision or topic (e.g., "switching from PostgreSQL to MongoDB", "hiring a freelancer vs. a full-time employee"). Set [PERSPECTIVE] to specify whose viewpoint matters (e.g., "a small startup with 5 engineers", "a solo content creator"). Set [N] to control how many points you want (4–6 is usually best for clarity). Replace [PRIORITY] with your primary goal (e.g., "speed of development", "long-term cost").
Variables
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
| [SUBJECT] | The decision, option, or topic being evaluated |
| [PERSPECTIVE] | Who is making the decision — their context shapes which pros and cons are most relevant |
| [N] | Number of pros and cons to generate (4–6 recommended for balanced coverage without padding) |
| [PRIORITY] | The most important goal or constraint — used to weight the verdict |
Tips
- Adding
[PERSPECTIVE]is the single most impactful change you can make — the same decision looks very different to a large enterprise vs. a solo founder. - Request that magnitude ratings (Low/Medium/High) be included so you can quickly see which factors actually move the needle.
- After getting the initial analysis, follow up with: "Which con is most commonly underestimated and why?" to surface risks that lists tend to downplay.