HR professionals are caught in a strange position with AI. Their work is 80% repeatable — the same job descriptions, the same onboarding emails, the same policy language, the same performance review templates. All of that is exactly what AI is good at. But the actual hard parts of HR — the difficult conversation, the judgment call about whether someone is a culture fit, the nuanced termination — those still require a person.
These 35 prompts are for the repeatable 80%. Use them as starting points. Always edit for your company's voice, your legal context, and your specific situation. And as a rule: anything generated for performance management, terminations, or legal-adjacent communications should go through your legal team before it goes to anyone.
One important caveat on recruiting prompts specifically: AI-generated job descriptions can inherit biases from training data. After generating, always audit for gendered language (coded words like "rockstar," "ninja," "dominate"), unnecessarily long requirements lists, and education requirements that don't actually predict job success. Tools like Textio or Gender Decoder can help with the audit.
Section 1: Recruiting
Prompt 1 — Job description from scratch
Best for: Writing JDs for new roles or when your existing template is stale.
Write a job description for the following role:
Job title: [TITLE]
Department: [DEPARTMENT]
Reports to: [TITLE]
Location/remote policy: [LOCATION OR REMOTE/HYBRID]
Compensation range (if disclosing): [RANGE OR "omit"]
Company: [BRIEF COMPANY DESCRIPTION — industry, size, stage]
Key responsibilities (I'll expand these, but the core areas are): [LIST 4–6 AREAS]
Required qualifications: [LIST WHAT'S TRULY REQUIRED]
Preferred qualifications: [LIST NICE-TO-HAVES]
Write this to be:
- Focused on what the person will DO, not just what they'll HAVE
- Free of gendered language and unnecessary jargon
- Compelling to the candidate, not just descriptive
- Honest about the role (don't oversell it)
Include an EEO statement at the end.
Prompt 2 — Inclusive language audit
Best for: Reviewing existing JDs before posting.
Review the following job description for language that might discourage qualified candidates from applying. Look for:
- Gendered language or coded words that skew masculine or feminine
- Requirements that are proxies for age, race, or socioeconomic status
- Education requirements that may not actually predict job performance
- "Culture" language that may favor in-group candidates
- Any requirement that could be reframed to be more inclusive
For each issue, suggest specific replacement language.
[PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
Prompt 3 — Screening questions for application
Best for: Building a short pre-screen that filters without being a wall.
Create 5 application screening questions for a [JOB TITLE] role. The questions should:
- Be answerable in under 3 minutes total
- Reveal something relevant that a resume doesn't show
- Avoid questions that could screen out protected classes
- Be open-ended enough to let strong candidates differentiate themselves
Key things I'm trying to assess at this stage: [LIST 2–3 THINGS — e.g., "relevant experience," "motivation for this specific company," "writing ability"]
Prompt 4 — Structured interview guide
Best for: Making interviews consistent and defensible.
Create a structured interview guide for a [JOB TITLE] role. This guide will be used by multiple interviewers.
The core competencies we're evaluating: [LIST 4–6 COMPETENCIES — e.g., "problem-solving," "collaboration," "communication," "domain expertise"]
For each competency:
- Write 2 behavioral interview questions (past behavior predicts future behavior)
- Write 1 situational question ("What would you do if...")
- Provide a scoring guide: what a 1, 3, and 5 answer looks like for each
Also include:
- Opening rapport-building questions
- A standard close where the candidate can ask questions
- An evaluation scorecard template
Prompt 5 — Technical/skills assessment design
Best for: Building a take-home assessment that's fair and actually predicts performance.
Design a skills assessment for a [JOB TITLE] candidate.
Role context: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THEY'LL DO]
Time budget: [X hours — keep it reasonable]
Key skills to test: [LIST 3–4]
The assessment should:
- Reflect actual work they'd do in the role (not trick questions)
- Be completable in the stated time by a qualified candidate
- Have clear instructions and evaluation criteria
- Include a rubric for scoring responses
- Avoid asking candidates to do work that benefits the company directly
Prompt 6 — Offer letter template
Best for: A clean, professional offer letter that covers what it needs to.
Draft an offer letter for the following hire:
Candidate name: [NAME]
Role: [JOB TITLE]
Department: [DEPARTMENT]
Start date: [DATE]
Compensation: [SALARY] annual base
Bonus: [BONUS STRUCTURE OR "none"]
Benefits: [HIGH-LEVEL BENEFITS — e.g., "health/dental/vision, 401k with match, 20 days PTO"]
Equity: [EQUITY DETAILS OR "none"]
Reports to: [MANAGER TITLE]
Employment type: [AT-WILL / FIXED TERM]
State: [STATE — employment law varies]
Include: contingencies (background check, I-9), IP assignment reference, at-will language (if applicable), offer expiration.
Tone: warm and welcoming — this is someone's new beginning.
Prompt 7 — Rejection email (post-application)
Best for: The high-volume early-stage rejection that still feels human.
Write a rejection email for candidates who applied to [JOB TITLE] but didn't make it past the initial screening.
The email should:
- Be warm and brief (under 150 words)
- Not be a form letter that's obviously templated
- Encourage them to apply for future roles if it's genuine
- Leave them with a positive impression of our company
- Not include feedback (at this stage, that's not practical)
Company name: [COMPANY NAME]
Prompt 8 — Rejection email (post-interview)
Best for: The harder rejection — after a real conversation.
Write a rejection email for a candidate who interviewed for [JOB TITLE] and made it to [INTERVIEW STAGE — e.g., "final round"].
The email should:
- Be personal, not a template
- Acknowledge the specific time they invested
- Be honest that we went with another candidate without explaining why in detail
- Leave the door open for future opportunities if appropriate
- Be under 200 words
Do not include: specific feedback (unless I add it), rankings or comparisons to other candidates, anything that creates legal exposure.
Prompt 9 — Recruiter outreach for passive candidates
Best for: LinkedIn or email outreach for sourced candidates.
Write a [LinkedIn message / cold email] to recruit a passive candidate for a [JOB TITLE] role.
What makes this role interesting: [2–3 GENUINE SELLING POINTS]
Company context: [BRIEF — what the company does, stage, culture highlight]
Why I'm reaching out to this person specifically: [WHAT CAUGHT MY EYE — e.g., "their background in X," "they built Y at Company Z"]
The message should:
- Be under 100 words for LinkedIn, under 200 for email
- Not lead with "I came across your profile"
- Reference something specific about them
- Be a question, not a pitch
- Sound like a human wrote it
Prompt 10 — Interview debrief facilitation guide
Best for: Running a structured debrief that avoids groupthink and confirmation bias.
Create a facilitation guide for a post-interview debrief for a [JOB TITLE] candidate.
Interviewers involved: [LIST ROLES — e.g., "hiring manager, two team members, HR"]
The debrief should:
- Have each person share their score and key observations before group discussion
- Prevent the first speaker from anchoring everyone else
- Address each core competency systematically
- Surface any concerns or red flags explicitly
- End with a clear hire/no-hire/more-info decision (no "let's keep looking")
Include questions the facilitator can use to push past surface reactions and get at specific evidence.
Section 2: Onboarding
Prompt 11 — 30/60/90 day plan
Best for: Setting new hires up with clear expectations from day one.
Create a 30/60/90 day onboarding plan for a new [JOB TITLE] in [DEPARTMENT].
Company context: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION]
Manager: [MANAGER TITLE]
Key priorities for this role: [LIST 3–4]
For each phase, include:
- Learning goals (what they should understand by the end of the period)
- Relationship-building milestones (who they should have met)
- Delivery milestones (what they should have produced or accomplished)
- How success will be assessed at the end of the period
The plan should be ambitious but realistic for someone who is genuinely new to the company.
Prompt 12 — Welcome email from hiring manager
Best for: The email a new hire gets before their first day.
Draft a welcome email from the hiring manager to a new [JOB TITLE] who starts on [DATE].
Include:
- A genuine welcome that reflects excitement about them specifically
- What their first day will look like (logistics)
- Who they'll meet and when
- Any prep they should do before they start (if anything — keep this light)
- Encouragement that it's okay to not know everything
Tone: warm, human, not HR-corporate. Should sound like the hiring manager wrote it, not a template.
Manager's name: [NAME]
New hire's name: [NAME]
Prompt 13 — First-week schedule
Best for: Structuring a new hire's first week so it's not overwhelming.
Create a first-week schedule for a new [JOB TITLE] starting on [DATE].
They'll need to:
- Complete I-9, payroll setup, and benefits enrollment
- Get set up on all systems: [LIST KEY TOOLS/SYSTEMS]
- Meet: [LIST KEY PEOPLE AND THEIR TITLES]
- Learn: [LIST 2–3 KEY PROCESSES OR CONCEPTS]
- Attend: [LIST ANY RECURRING MEETINGS THEY'LL JOIN]
Structure the week hour-by-hour for the first 2 days, then day-by-day for days 3–5. Build in white space for absorbing information — don't pack every hour.
Prompt 14 — Buddy program guidelines
Best for: Setting up a buddy system that actually helps new hires.
Create guidelines for an onboarding buddy program at [COMPANY NAME].
Include:
- What a buddy is (and isn't) — not a manager, not a trainer
- How buddies are selected and matched to new hires
- A suggested interaction schedule for the first 90 days
- 10 conversation topics/questions buddies can use to break the ice
- What the buddy should proactively tell every new hire (unwritten rules, culture norms, who to go to for what)
- How to gracefully wind down the formal buddy relationship at 90 days
Company size/culture context: [BRIEF — helps tailor the tone]
Prompt 15 — Training schedule for a specific role
Best for: Making sure onboarding training is thorough without being chaotic.
Create a training schedule for a new [JOB TITLE] during their first [4-8] weeks.
Skills and knowledge they need to develop:
[LIST 6–8 AREAS — e.g., "product knowledge," "CRM system," "internal process X," "compliance training Y"]
For each training area:
- Suggested format (shadowing, reading, video, hands-on practice)
- Estimated time required
- Who owns/facilitates this training
- How competency will be assessed before moving on
Sequence the training logically — foundations before advanced topics.
Prompt 16 — New hire check-in questions
Best for: Making 30/60/90 day check-ins actually useful.
Create check-in question guides for new hire conversations at 30, 60, and 90 days.
At each milestone, the questions should surface:
- How the new hire is feeling (honestly, not just "great!")
- What's going well
- What's confusing or harder than expected
- Whether they have what they need to be successful
- Any concerns about the role or team
The 90-day check-in should also assess: whether the role is what they expected, their confidence level, and their initial performance self-assessment.
Make the questions open-ended and non-leading — we want honest answers, not reassurance.
Prompt 17 — Onboarding survey
Best for: Systematically learning what works in your onboarding process.
Create an onboarding experience survey to send to new hires at the end of their first [30/60/90] days.
The survey should measure:
- Clarity of role expectations
- Quality of training and resources
- Manager and team support
- Whether the job matched what was described in recruiting
- Overall experience rating
- Net Promoter Score: "How likely are you to recommend this company to a friend?"
- Open-ended: what would have made your onboarding better?
Keep it under 10 minutes to complete. Mix rating scales with open-ended questions.
Prompt 18 — Offboarding checklist and exit interview guide
Best for: Making sure exits are clean and you learn from them.
Create an offboarding checklist for a departing [JOB TITLE].
Checklist should cover:
- Knowledge transfer (documentation, handoff meetings)
- System access revocation (I'll add the specific systems)
- Equipment return
- Final paycheck and benefits continuation (COBRA, equity vesting)
- Reference agreement if applicable
- Exit interview scheduling
Also create an exit interview guide with 8–10 questions that are:
- Honest (not designed to get positive quotes)
- Focused on learning, not retention
- Non-defensive (even if they're leaving because of a manager)
The goal is intelligence, not a PR exercise.
Section 3: Performance management
Prompt 19 — Performance review template
Best for: A review template that generates useful input, not just ratings.
Create a performance review template for [JOB LEVEL — e.g., individual contributor, manager] at [COMPANY TYPE — e.g., startup, enterprise].
The template should have sections for:
- Goal achievement (with space for each goal and rating + narrative)
- Core competencies: [LIST YOUR COMPANY'S COMPETENCIES — e.g., "collaboration," "communication," "problem-solving," "execution"]
- Strengths this period (specific, evidenced)
- Development areas (specific, actionable)
- Goals for next review period
- Overall performance rating with definition of each level
- Employee self-assessment section (mirror structure)
Rating scale: [1–5 / 1–4 / "Exceeds/Meets/Below"] — specify which
Prompt 20 — Manager narrative coaching
Best for: Helping managers write specific, useful performance narratives (not vague platitudes).
A manager has provided the following performance notes about their direct report. Rewrite these as professional performance review narrative that is specific, balanced, and actionable.
Original manager notes: [PASTE MANAGER'S DRAFT OR NOTES]
Employee level: [LEVEL]
Review period: [PERIOD]
Overall rating the manager wants to convey: [RATING]
The rewrite should:
- Use specific examples and outcomes, not adjectives
- Be honest about development areas without being harsh
- Be defensible if challenged
- Not include anything that could be read as discriminatory
- Sound like the manager wrote it (not HR)
Prompt 21 — PIP draft
Best for: A performance improvement plan that's clear, fair, and legally defensible.
Draft a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for the following situation:
Employee role: [JOB TITLE]
Performance issues: [DESCRIBE SPECIFICALLY — e.g., "missed 4 of 6 quarterly targets," "3 documented instances of late deliverables," "customer complaint rate 2x team average"]
Prior feedback provided: [DESCRIBE — dates and nature of prior conversations]
PIP duration: [30/60/90 days]
State: [STATE — employment law matters here]
The PIP should include:
- Clear description of the performance gap
- Specific, measurable improvement targets
- Resources and support provided to the employee
- Milestones and check-in schedule
- Consequences if targets aren't met
- Employee acknowledgment section
This is a legal document. Flag anything that needs legal review before use.
Prompt 22 — Goal-setting framework
Best for: Helping managers and employees set goals that are actually useful.
Create a goal-setting template for [ANNUAL / QUARTERLY] planning for a [JOB TITLE].
Framework: [OKRs / SMART goals / specify your framework]
Number of goals: [3–5]
Company priorities this period: [LIST 2–3 COMPANY-LEVEL PRIORITIES]
For each goal, the template should capture:
- The goal statement
- Why it matters (connection to team/company priorities)
- Success metrics (how we'll know it was achieved)
- Key milestones by quarter/month
- Dependencies (what/who needs to come through)
- Rating criteria at review time
Also create a brief guide for managers on how to give useful goal-setting feedback to their reports.
Prompt 23 — Feedback language guide
Best for: Training managers to give better feedback year-round.
Create a manager's guide to giving effective performance feedback.
Include:
- The SBI model (Situation, Behavior, Impact) with 3 worked examples
- How to give positive feedback that reinforces the right behavior (not just "great job")
- How to give corrective feedback without triggering defensiveness
- Language to avoid and what to say instead (e.g., instead of "you always..." try "in the last two weeks, I noticed...")
- How to handle a defensive or emotional reaction
- How to close a feedback conversation with a clear next step
Write this as a practical guide a manager can keep handy, not a theory lecture.
Prompt 24 — Calibration session facilitation guide
Best for: Running a performance calibration that's consistent and fair.
Create a facilitation guide for a performance calibration session for [DEPARTMENT/TEAM].
Participants: [LIST MANAGER TITLES]
Rating scale: [YOUR SCALE]
Time available: [X hours]
The session should:
- Ensure ratings are applied consistently across the team
- Surface any employees who may be over- or under-rated
- Address potential bias in ratings (recency bias, halo effect, in-group favoritism)
- Result in a clear distribution and documented rationale
Include: agenda, discussion questions for each rating level, a process for resolving disagreements, and documentation template.
Prompt 25 — Promotion justification
Best for: Writing the case for a promotion that actually persuades the decision-makers.
Help me write a promotion justification for [EMPLOYEE NAME/ROLE].
Current level: [LEVEL]
Proposed level: [LEVEL]
Time in current role: [DURATION]
Evidence of readiness:
- Accomplishments: [LIST 3–5 SPECIFIC ACCOMPLISHMENTS WITH OUTCOMES]
- Scope expansion: [HOW THEIR WORK HAS EXPANDED BEYOND CURRENT LEVEL]
- Leadership demonstrated: [SPECIFIC EXAMPLES]
- Feedback from stakeholders: [SUMMARY OF PEER/CROSS-FUNCTIONAL FEEDBACK]
Write a justification document (300–500 words) that makes a business case, not just a tenure case. Address what they've done at the next level already, not just how long they've waited.
Prompt 26 — Difficult conversation prep
Best for: Any hard conversation — corrective feedback, PIP delivery, termination prep.
Help me prepare for the following difficult conversation:
Situation: [DESCRIBE — e.g., "I need to tell a long-tenured employee they're not getting promoted," "I need to address repeated lateness with someone who has personal circumstances," "I need to deliver a PIP to someone who thinks they're performing well"]
Employee context: [BRIEF — tenure, performance history, likely reaction]
My goal: [WHAT OUTCOME DO I WANT FROM THIS CONVERSATION]
Give me:
- An opening statement (first 3 sentences I'll say)
- The key points I need to land, in order
- How to handle 3 likely reactions: [defensive / emotional / shut-down]
- What I should NOT say
- How to close the conversation with a clear next step
I'll role-play this mentally before the actual conversation.
Section 4: Policy writing
Prompt 27 — Policy first draft
Best for: Writing a new policy without starting from a blank page.
Draft a [POLICY NAME — e.g., Remote Work Policy, AI Use Policy, PTO Policy] for [COMPANY NAME].
Company context: [SIZE, INDUSTRY, CULTURE]
State(s) where employees are located: [STATES]
Key provisions to include: [LIST WHAT MUST BE IN THE POLICY]
Any edge cases or exceptions to address: [LIST ANY SPECIFIC SITUATIONS]
The policy should:
- Be clear enough that an employee can read it and know what to do
- Be specific (avoid vague language like "reasonable" without definition)
- Cover the process for exceptions and how to request them
- Note any legal requirements it's designed to address
- Include an effective date and owner
This is a draft that will be reviewed by legal before implementation.
Prompt 28 — AI use policy
Best for: The policy that every company needs right now and almost none have.
Draft a company AI use policy for [COMPANY NAME].
Company context: [INDUSTRY, SIZE]
AI tools currently in use or approved: [LIST OR "TBD"]
Key concerns to address: [e.g., "confidential data input," "IP ownership of AI outputs," "disclosure requirements," "use in hiring decisions"]
State(s) of operation: [STATES]
The policy should cover:
- What AI tools employees may use and for what purposes
- What data they may NOT input into AI tools (trade secrets, customer PII, etc.)
- How AI-generated work should be disclosed and verified
- Any prohibited uses
- Consequences of violations
- How the policy will be updated as AI evolves
Make it practical — employees should be able to follow it without needing a lawyer to interpret it.
Prompt 29 — Plain-English policy summary
Best for: Making existing policies actually readable.
Here is our [POLICY NAME]:
[PASTE POLICY]
Rewrite this in plain English for employees. The summary should:
- Be under 500 words (the original doesn't matter how long it is)
- Use headers and bullet points
- Lead with "What this means for you"
- Explain the 3 most important things employees need to know
- Note any common mistakes or misunderstandings
- Include "For questions, contact [PERSON/EMAIL]"
Don't simplify in ways that create legal inaccuracies — flag any places where simplification might be risky.
Prompt 30 — Remote work policy
Best for: The policy most companies wrote in a hurry in 2020 and never updated.
Draft a remote work policy for [COMPANY NAME].
Policy should cover:
- Eligibility (which roles are remote-eligible and how that's determined)
- Work hours expectations (core hours, availability, time zones)
- Equipment and expense reimbursement
- Home office requirements (secure connection, dedicated workspace, etc.)
- Performance expectations vs. in-office
- In-person requirements (quarterly on-sites, specific meetings)
- How remote work agreements are approved and can be revoked
- Data security requirements
State(s): [STATES — different states have different reimbursement requirements]
Company stance: [FULLY REMOTE / HYBRID / REMOTE AS EXCEPTION]
Prompt 31 — Policy FAQ
Best for: The employee questions you know are coming when you roll out a new policy.
We're rolling out our [POLICY NAME]. Anticipate the 10 most common questions employees will ask and write clear, honest answers.
Policy summary: [PASTE KEY PROVISIONS]
For each Q&A:
- Write the question as an employee would actually ask it (not a straw man)
- Give a direct answer (not "it depends" without explanation)
- Note any exceptions or edge cases in the answer
- Flag any question where the answer might be "talk to HR" — but only where that's genuinely the right answer
This will be published on our internal wiki.
Section 5: Employee communications
Prompt 32 — All-hands announcement
Best for: Communicating a major company change in a way that doesn't create panic.
Draft an all-hands communication announcing [CHANGE — e.g., "a reorganization," "a new executive hire," "a shift to hybrid work," "a layoff"].
Context: [DESCRIBE THE CHANGE AND WHY IT'S HAPPENING]
Audience: all employees
Key messages to land: [LIST 2–3 THINGS THEY NEED TO UNDERSTAND]
What will change for employees: [BE SPECIFIC]
What won't change: [IF RELEVANT — stability messaging]
Q&A process: [HOW WILL EMPLOYEES GET THEIR QUESTIONS ANSWERED]
Tone: honest, not spin. Employees can tell when leadership is managing a message — be direct about what's happening and why.
Format: can be read in under 3 minutes. Include an FAQ at the end.
Prompt 33 — Culture survey questions
Best for: An engagement survey that generates actually useful data.
Create an employee engagement survey for [COMPANY NAME].
Key areas to measure:
- Overall engagement and satisfaction
- Manager effectiveness
- Role clarity and growth opportunity
- Company direction and communication
- Team dynamics
- Psychological safety
- Compensation and benefits perception
Survey requirements:
- Mix of 1–10 scales (for benchmarking) and open-ended questions
- Include at minimum 2 eNPS questions: one for recommending as a place to work, one for recommending their manager
- Under 15 minutes to complete
- Anonymous (no questions that would identify the respondent)
Aim for 25–30 questions total.
Prompt 34 — Recognition program framework
Best for: Building an employee recognition system that actually works.
Design an employee recognition program for [COMPANY NAME].
Company context: [SIZE, BUDGET — rough, CULTURE]
Include:
- Types of recognition (peer-to-peer, manager-to-employee, company-wide)
- Frequency and occasions (milestone, achievement, behavior-based)
- How recognition is delivered (public vs. private)
- Tangible rewards if applicable (I'll customize amounts)
- Manager guidance: how to give recognition that lands (not just "nice work")
- How to measure whether the program is working
Avoid: programs that feel like HR theater, recognition that's mandatory and therefore meaningless, or systems that favor extroverts or visible roles over quiet contributors.
Prompt 35 — Layoff communication
Best for: The hardest communication in HR — with care and honesty.
Help me draft layoff communications for [COMPANY NAME]. This is a [NUMBER]-person reduction affecting [DEPARTMENTS/ROLES].
I need:
1. The script for the individual conversation with affected employees (manager to read)
2. The all-company email to go out same day
3. The message to remaining employees after the individual conversations are complete
4. Talking points for managers of affected and non-affected teams
Key facts to communicate:
- Why this is happening: [HONEST REASON — business performance, strategic shift, etc.]
- What severance and benefits continuation employees will receive: [DETAILS]
- What the transition timeline is: [DETAILS]
- Who employees can contact with questions: [HR CONTACT]
Tone requirements: honest, respectful, not corporate spin. These are real people. Don't hide behind passive voice or euphemism. Avoid: "restructuring," "right-sizing," "impacted employees" — call it what it is.
Getting the most out of these
The prompts above will save you hours, but they need your context to be good. The more specific you are — company size, industry, the state you're operating in, the exact situation — the better the output. A vague prompt gets a generic result. A specific one gets something you can actually edit and use.
One consistent thing I've seen: AI is good at structure and language, but HR still requires judgment. The AI can draft your PIP; it can't tell you whether issuing it is the right call for this person at this moment. It can draft your offer letter; it can't tell you whether the candidate you're making the offer to is actually the right hire. Use it to handle the administrative weight so you have more capacity for the judgment calls.
Check out the prompt library for business and professional use cases for more templates, and see building your own prompt workflow if you want to set up a personal system for these.



